And unfortunately, Whirlpool coinjoins reveal common input ownership and create toxic change that can be used to track your future transactions:
This is FUD. Address clusters and peeling chains are not unique to Whirlpool CoinJoins. The exact same thing can happen with Wasabi mixes (which you are obviously here to shill) without proper coin control practices. I followed all of the txs you mentioned and you're right. They are linked to each other via a peeling chain but that doesn't mean that the common ownership heuristic doesn't apply to Wasabi txs after they get mixed. Not using adequate coin control practices can absolutely result in txs being linked together but that has nothing to do with Whirlpool specifically.
I am not spreading FUD, address clusters from common input ownership and peeling chains from leftover change ARE unique to Whirlpool coinjoins.
You are spreading FUD because common input ownership is not revealed and peeling chains are not produced (unless you are a whale with more coins than all the other participants) in Wasabi's coinjoins and there is no coin control necessary. You can verify this yourself by simply looking at the Bitcoin blockchain:
Whirlpool does not provide this sort of complete privacy for your entire funds. You always generate traceable leftovers:
I think you're being a bit disingenuous with your response and are more interested in flexing on OP while you tout Wasabi in your signature and website link.
No, I'm not being disingenuous, people following the guide will actually be deanonymized. The worst possible outcome is that people get a false sense of securtity.