We know that all teams want to take advantage of the conflict situation that occurred between Sancho and manager Ten Hag. In fact, there are three possible options regarding the player future, permanent move, loan and free transfer. However, the latter will only happen if Sancho and United's management agree to mutually terminate the contract, but if United wants to get a large amount of money then the best option is to sell it to an SPL club.
I think his future is very difficult to predict considering United don't want to let him go on loan, and plus they want some of their expenses to be recouped by releasing Sancho in the January transfer window. To strengthen United's main squad and be included in Ten Hag's chosen players, it seems very impossible to happen, everything will be answered in January.
To be honest, I don't follow developments regarding Ten Hag and Sancho anymore. but what is certain is that this player has been exiled from Old Trafford. actually, I don't understand the internal problems within the Manchester United camp. But like it or not, Ten Hag or the club management did not let it drag on, which ultimately became an obstacle for themselves.
Referring to Romano's report, Juventus recently requested information about the player and expressed interest in recruiting him next January. However, it seems that Juve are interested in a loan agreement and paying the player's salary. Meanwhile, it is reported that Manchester United only wants to sell Sancho permanently next January. well, considering Juventus' current condition, it will be difficult for them to buy him. therefore, they plan to choose the loan option. considering that Sancho has a very long contract duration, United also brought him from Dortmund at a quite fantastic price. It is unlikely that both parties will terminate the contract.
So, the best option is to sell it. Well, like the last point you said. United just want to sell him, and that's the rumor currently circulating. So, there is no loan option. to make sure everything will be answered in January, as you said.