It is said in these parts "conchita de mango." -/ I leave it in Spanish for its best translation, but, meaning that you slip, you fall, in a situation that is not how you analyzed it in the first instance, given the play of ideas in the context/-.

KYC is not necessarily relevant for most players, they do it and that's it, hey, it has always existed.
Then, in reality with no KYC something similar happens to what happened with porn in the early 90s on the Internet. Those years, it was embarrassing to put your DBT, where later in your account statements you literally had "Porno hub" publicly, that was solved in many ways, but, that are another story.

Well, the majority of serious players seeks to protect their privacy and is what is really tempting to choose that path, then you protect your information that is always at risk and you guarantee your security.

Then it happens that KYC, unfortunately in my opinion, is applied very poorly, fortunately only in some casinos, who want to take advantage of those "legal grays" to delay withdrawals, or they used AML to ask you not only for your legal information but also to your neighbor too (sarcasm).

In short, that is a good reason to opt for casinos that offer no KYC, at least partially that idea currently since reputable crypto casinos are in the idea of doing KYC.

And it is sad to think that because of a few "criminals" the vast majority of players have to be affected by their right to privacy.