I would not hold it against anybody for trying to articulate their views but when there is excessive information (in one go without breaks), it does become very difficult for the average person to keep up. In this case, the OP has made accusations but has to accept he voluntarily signed up to a set of Terms and Conditions he should abide by and not only that but if as blackjack.fun stated the OP exploited a bug, then blackjack.fun really have no case to answer whether it is for $24 or $100 bounty.

He probably has thicker skin therefore is playing the victim because he has been around the forum long enough to know how things work but has opted to go down this route of his own volition.

Also, I have never interacted with the blackjack.fun forum representative but refute the allegation he is insulting the intellect of any member. On the contrary, it seems he is trying to gain sympathy for his failings to tarnish the blackjack.fun website but he not succeeded on that front either.