I don't understand the point then. If you agree that BCH and BSV are shitcoins for reasons other than the blockchsize increase, what makes you be against block size increases then?
If bitcoin increases its block capacity it wouldn't make it lose all that makes it good, right?
It's not that simple, it's more complicated.
Propagation time would increase, orphan blocks would increase, centralization would increase.
And what about people storing 4K
pedo pr0n inside the blockchain? Why make it so easy?
Who the hell would wanna run a node that stores pedo pr0n? Unless you wanna destroy the BTC blockchain (to promote CBDC or whatever), it makes zero sense.
From a theoretical standpoint, anyone can post whatever imagery in the Blockchain even now, no matter how expensive. Ordinals tech which utilizes Taproot along with SegWit discount make that even easier to happen on bitcoins chain.
As of orphan blocks, I think miners will be able to handle having access to decent latency internet... Even most miners connect to pools these days and let them handle block propagation so this affects very few parties which are big enough to work on it I think. They were complaining about going above 1MB blocks then but handled 4MB well...
Can anyone tell me if the data I see on Blockchain.info is true? Is it true that there hasn't been a single orphan block since 2017 or did they just stop counting?
