That's because that's what you believe. In my personal opinion, it's probably better to maintain its current course of development and value decentralization and security more than the accomodation of a higher number of transactions through bigger blocks. Because technically, Bitcoin at its essence might not be a mere "consumer-product", or a network to "replace banks".
blah.. windfury jsut reciting the mantra of the party line.. without doing any math
Plus do you actually believe a single decentralized database could process all of the trillions of financial transactions per day? No? Then use Netflix's centralized/federated data centers with their very-low-latency, high-rate-of-data transfer. That would probably fix the problem. But that wouldn't be a protocol called Bitcoin.
and then goes and uses exagerations
there are 8 billion people on the entire planet. and not all of them use one currency..
but lets say they did.. for "trillions of transactions" requires each person to buy 12 items a days SEPARETLY for one trillion.. you used plural so multiply it by your magic plural amount you have in your head..
but becasue not everyone uses one currency naturally, lets take yours
250m mature people using the dollar . they do not even do 3 billion transactions per day
so stop with the exaggeration that one currency needs to do trillions.. let alone billions of transactions a day
you training of changing a discussion of reasonable adjustments at regular periods vs your stupid training of pretending the argument is about "gigabytes by next year" make you look foolish
get away from your training officer(forum-daddy) and think for yourself. he is not helping you
try to use actual data, real statistics, math and logic.. not some story some troll you call daddy tells you