I guess if a post is of extremely low quality and it shows that the person making it didn't read even the first page of the thread, report it to the mods (as was already suggested). Low/zero-value posts should be reported anyway.
I'm not talking about those posts. If you go to the two examples I have compiled, neither of them are low value or off topic. The first is on topic because it answers the question but by answering without reading robelneo's answer it is assuming something that has already been shown to be false. The second case is neither low value nor off topic, which is redundant because you haven't read what the OP himself said a few comments later on the first page.
The ones that are reportable I will report and the ones that are like these cases I will compile.
Recently?
Just several?
Am I still on Bitcointalk?
I get it that you're angry about some shitposters but you can consider yourself damn lucky if this is all.
I've come across shitposter who don't read anything other than the title and are competing based on that despite the first post being completely different, someone posting some crap on the third or fourth page without reading the previous stuff, it's annoying but it's also the norm nowadays.
I'm not talking about that, so far I've been talking about cases that comment on the first page (or the first comment on the second page) and they haven't even read a couple of comments above, because if they had read them they wouldn't write what they have written.
I will specify it better in the reporting thread.