I'm curious (and may open my own poll about it shortly), is there anyone who believes that posting unaccredited AI text isn't plagiarism?
If you opened such a poll, I think at least 80% would vote that AI generated content is plagiarism unless the poster says it's AI generated.
I rarely see accounts removed from campaigns after getting caught posting AI.
I don't know how often it happens either probably because it's time consuming to check and hard to prove in some cases.
- its not considered plagiarism by moderator standards (as of the moment)
There is no written rule about it, but do we know for sure that if there is proof that a user used AI generated content and got caught with it, that admins won't take action such as deleting the post and or temp/perma ban that user?
The Forum is against it or are you telling me that is ok to make use of AI?
My stance on AI usage is very clear. Read my previous posts in this thread if you are in doubt. If you are saying that the forum is officially against it, then show me the rule that prohibits the use of AI. Or, show me a post of the administrators confirming that AI posts aren't allowed.
If is cool using AI why do we have red tags on members who uses AI?
Why are you bringing red tags into the discussion? The trust system doesn't have anything to do with it, and anyone can post any feedback they want. I can give you a positive, neutral, or negative tag right now but that action of mine doesn't represent the forum's position.
I still don't understand why you refuse to accept the fact that is part of the rules of the Forum like the community kick against the use of AI.
Your failure to understand what I am saying is exactly that: your failure. It's got nothing to do with me. My opinion on AI-generated content can be found in this thread. I assume you can find it and comprehend it. And you are again confusing apples and oranges. The trust system isn't the voice of the forum administration. It's a subjective rating system of the community that they can but don't have to use.