The mining algorithm has nothing to do with transaction fees.
yes it does.
sha-256 is setup to mine BTC. btc is 10 blocks an hour
scrypt is setup to merge mine 20 blocks of LTC an hour and 100 blocks of doge an hour.
So room for 10 blocks of tx fees vs
room for 120 blocks of tx fees
both Algos have LN service
So scrypt can do 12x the volume of btc
The fact you posted what you posted shows how deep the problem runs as you did not understand my concerns in the least or the reasons I keep writing this.
using btc via sha 256 for cash in small amounts is at a 12x disadvantage to using scrypt LTC/Doge
So rather then complain about high fees lets move on to proper use for
BTC
Large value movement of wealth
Large value storage of wealth
LTC/Doge
small value payments
small value storage.
The solution above would work . At least that is the way I see it.
Bcash and Bcash SV use the SHA-256 algorithm also and their fees are comparable to or perhaps even cheaper than LTC and DOGE. Ethereum has higher throughput capacity than LTC & DOGE, yet its fees are higher. Fees are more a result of demand for blockspace and total capacity rather than the consensus algorithm used.