The question effectively becomes: "What does it take to get everyone on the same page?"
For the record (and before obnoxiousgasbag1 tries to put more words in my mouth), I'm not fully opposed to throughput increases. I'd just rather any proposals are appropriately timed, measured, reasoned and that all the consequences are fully considered.
but you REKT proposals by you scripting to your flock silly exagerations.. not real technical reasons
Even under the pressure of Ordinals, we can't find agreement within a tiny sample of network participants. It seems unlikely we'd find network-wide consensus, so cryptozize isn't wrong to point out the inevitable outcome if people try to rush this.
but you dont beleive in the PEOPLE. you dont like consensus, you love the "backward compatibility" that bypasses the requirement of a consensus vote. you hate anyone not core adoring/affiliated. you love only core having the decision and development power.. so why pretend that its "people" trying to rush it.. rather than admit its core avoiding for unreasonable reasons