I am simply questioning your timing, according to the reference you used in your feedback, digaran should have been tagged since 2018, but you only remembered to tag him the moment he disagreed with your political views, had you not found other negative feedback on his profile, what would you do to punish him for disagreeing with you? add him to your distrust list?
Yes, he should have been tagged way sooner. My bad. Most of hist posts are Bitcointalk rule violations anyways for "trolling" but since it's not enforced, he thinks he can derail every topic.
Quote
Well, looking at digaran's feedback, he's doing that for quite a while
Correct, but it seems fine by you, until he disagrees with your political view, no?
What a level headed opinion...
This would end up as a massive shitshow, where trolls will get food left and right.
I'm usually only getting active with trust feedbacks, when I'm getting dragged into a confrontation.
And I believe this is vital to avoid too much drama on the forum.
it's clear that I am not objecting to that, but you are mixing political views and the trust system, just because I think you are brainwashed by certain media -- it does not mean I think you are untrustworthy.
Well, if you like to get some accusations going, I'll respond that you are brainwashed by islamist propaganda and you have a problem with it that I*m opposing that. You couldn't care less but as we know from islamist extremists, they'll force their believes on others at any price. Quote
2. I'm allowed to change, or remove any of my trust feedbacks. This isn't controversial at all.
Quote
3. Wow, seems like we have to justify every change in our trust list
Quote
4. Same like 3 but for distrust list
You are allowed to do all of that, but your behavior makes your feedback worthless,
It's a decentralized system.
That's how DT works.
Also, I'm thinking your judgement is not something I would feel fine to support.
That's why I've distrusted you.
Get over it.
you could very will bring to DT2 untrustworthy members who just happen to share your political points of you.
How about backing your claims with some proof, that I would bring "untrustworthy members" into DT2? Unproven speculations are exactly what we don't need on DT.
What a shady try from you to discredit me with things, where you don't have any proof.
Quote
I'm always trying to be fair on DT and giving the people the benefit of doubt and I was already considering to remove you from my distrust list,
Unlike you, I am not obsessed with the trust system, your exclusion means exactly nothing to me in itself, it's your behavior, that I personally think will hurt the trust system.
I'm not obsessed with being a DT member at all. I wouldn't care less if you or someone else distrusts me. You can do it, right away, if you feel so. Same like I have distrusted you.
I also don't know what was your ultimate goal by excluding me from your trust list
I'm changing my trust list quite frequently, so you've been in the mix that week. It's not controversial at all. Some DT1 members have a distrust list, where much more members (trolls) are on. Maybe it's more of a problem, that people feel offended by getting removed from DT? Maybe such people are the bigger issue?
I don't know.
It's really sad to see your misleading suggestions here, like the one I would be adding "untrustworthy members" to DT, which isn't true at all.
It's really sad to see your reaction here now about our personal issue because I believed this was (mostly settled) and was reconsidering to remove you from my distrust list but thanks to this post, this might still be far away.
I feel I'm way too often way too soft on trust issues, giving everyone too much benefit of doubt.
But on the other hand, I don't want to cause too much unnecessary drama because it's just a waste of time.
It's so simple, that everyone can create his own trust list and should have a thicker skin if someone distrusts anyone / doesn't trust anyone anymore.