If 4GB blocks become the norm
BSV, BCH etc are all irrelevant, talking about GB blocks is also irrelevant to Bitcoin block size discussions, no one is stupid enough to actually think about anything above 100MB by 2030. So I think bringing GB is bad, it makes mining centralized etc is a fallacy.
I don't know who you are but it seems you have a few pockets filled by recent spam attacks and you are trying to deviate from the actual concern, which is ; Bitcoin has to scale. I would say if we had 8MB blocks, we could hit the walls of $80,000 by now, but that's just speculation right?
and it needs to scale better than the ltc/doge 12x tx capacity edge.
So are we at 4mb right now. 12x that is 48mb
maybe it tries 32mb blocks and 0.0001000 as a minimum dust send with 0.00001 as a minimum fee.
So what that does for ordinal prevention.