I believe some of you might start going deeper into the argument for bigger blocks that you might also start to think Roger Ver and Bitcoin Cash made the right decision, and you might also start debating for Satoshi's original vision.
It really depends on what classifies as "right". Opinions fundamentally differ on block size policy.
Is it because it would also depend on what that person's definition of "scaling" is?
I'm actually now very curious. What is your definition or idea of how scaling Bitcoin should actually be? Because we might not have a common definition/idea, and that's where the issues start.
It's not just for BlackHatCoiner. I want to know everyone's definition/idea about scaling.