As for the "conflict" that started the whole thing, I'm quite surprised that you both went that far. A completely useless debate where both sides claim that their media sources of information are more honest than the other. That's the first thing I saw after a quick look at the discussion you mentioned.
I think this sums it up nicely. I don't feel like reading all the details, but from what I've seen, none of this should have been a reason to create drama. So you disagree. That's okay.
This has potential to turn into a year-long-feut. Don't go there, get a beer together and move on.