If you can provide it here, it'll be much appreciated. Aside from that deposit, do you remember the total fund you've deposited into Blackjack.fun? Ballpark is ok.
As for what difference does it make between winning but never deposit or winning with deposit, for me, it affect whether this case can be considered a scam or not. I think a scam needs a monetary loss or certain damage being involved. Further, it also affect the degree of severity of this case and [suppose it's escalated to having to leave a feedback because they're proven to be the one being wrong here] what tag should be given. If there's no monetary loss [i.e. only time loss due to spending them on the platform], I don't think I should or would leave a negative feedback, as there is no risk of losing fund dealing with them.
Here is my last deposit :
https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/6213d6ca513533ade113a0fa76950a5052c25a2c6dfa4e6879516479def758c4 Only saving that cause a few days ago.
Please count I also do some bet and win, I did betting with total rest unpaid is 117USD.
[...]
Thank you for the hash. I believe TMfC...qSeU is the deposit address for Blackjack.fun? You've at least deposited 276 TRX into the account. Small number [arguably] but still, it shows that you've deposited some fund into the platform instead of what Blackjack claimed, that you deposited nothing. Granted, their claim is USDT, but given you've deposited some fund into their platform, the claim shouldn't even be stated as it bears no weight and have a tendency of misleading.
I'd like to know Blackjack's response for my previous question, whether there's another points that ties those several accounts to OP's, be it device fingerprints or perhaps those alleged alt accounts also perform KYC with similar ID as OP used for his KYC? Because if it's just IP address, I think it's not enough to conclude that the IPs belong to OP, given OP's country uses dynamic IP address.