That being said, 1miau you might consider looking at your sent feedbacks and making some changes. I'm not telling you that you must do it, I am just asking you to take a look. Leaving a red for someone's opinion shouldn't happen and I see a couple of them on your page. Neutral at best and even then, it's not a trade so technically it's not a correct feedback to use.
That's why I'm using neutral feedbacks instead of negative ones despite some members have received negative trusts for much less from other members. I'll always review my feedbacks and most feedbacks include a reference link, so people are able to read up on the issue, which is a very important part in my opinion. Feedback should just be like "hey, this topic is of interest when dealing with user xy, where it's worth to read up on".
Our troll KingScorpio got a negative trust for "I just don't trust him" and even that is a DT feedback.
I've been saying this forever now, we need a new system. We need the current feedback system for trades, and we need a feedback system for reputation. Look at my page, I have tagged a bunch for cheating campaign. Can those users be trusted? Nope, but I technically didn't engage in a trade so is my feedback correct? Serious question there. If people do not believe it is, what should be done instead of a tag?
That's an interesting suggestion and should be explored if that's possible to implement.
We also need a better approach to mitigate shitposting and trust farming as it's very easy currently to send some nice-guy feedbacks, especially Member or Full Member accounts, if they think to get that way into DT.