Note: Open AI still states that content generated using their API should:
Social media, livestreaming, and demonstrations:
<…> • Indicate that the content is AI-generated in a way no user could reasonably miss or misunderstand. <…>
See:
https://openai.com/policies/sharing-publication-policy#content-co-authored-with-the-openai-api-policySo even from the point of view of Open AI, user’s should credit the fact that the content is AI generated when it is. The problem obviously resides in proving it, but that does not give one a free pass on his intent.
Thanks for finding this and posting it... I spent a few minutes reading through the OpenAI terms and conditions the other day looking for something similar but didn't notice that clause.
I suspect we will continue to have lazy shitposters finding ways to skirt their ChatGPT copy/pastes from being detected by the detectors, rather than bothering to use their own brains to generate thoughts. Here's one such example:
Exactly! Casinos are designed to have an edge, ensuring they stay profitable. While some may have those extraordinary wins, for many, it's a game of chance with varying outcomes. It's essential to approach gambling with an understanding of the odds and acknowledging that in the long run, if we tend to lose big time, the casinos win big time.
Anyway, am i in profit? No. Do i still bet? Yes haha but am i in debt? No
Here you can see the post is buffered by original content ("Exactly!", and "Anyway, ..."). But the middle chunk is 100% AI-generated.
Copyleaks: AI content detected
Hivemoderation: 100% likely to be AI generated
Sapling.ai: 100% fake
As a matter of fact I'm going thru this person's posts and will probably find a lot of them to report
here. The Gambling section is chock full of such posts. Where will the moderators draw the line? We'll find out.