On our platform, players can deposit certain NFTs and break them into 1,000 pieces called mNFTs, which can be further merged or broken as the player wishes. We also offer Lucky Spin rewards, where players can win these mNFTs as part of their bonuses, available daily and upon leveling up.
The user in question received numerous AZUKI mNFT rewards and predominantly used them for consistent low-odds wagers, primarily in the range of 1.01–1.05x. While such wagering patterns might not raise concerns in small volumes, in this case, over 99.9% of the user's gameplay followed this pattern, essentially bypassing traditional gambling.
It's crucial to mention that the wager rewards are provided in BCD, which is paired with USDT. The extensive wagering with AZUKI translated to over $550,000 in earned bonuses.
However, the primary reason for confiscating the user's funds was the discovery of an error in our AZUKI price listing. We had mistakenly listed it 3.2 times higher than its actual value, resulting in us awarding the user 3.2 times more rewards than they should have received. The user was well aware of this discrepancy and continued wagering with AZUKI solely to accumulate BCD bonuses. The player could not lose here and was essentially printing money.
In summary, this is a clear instance of bonus abuse, and consequently, we confiscated the remaining balance in the player's account. It's worth noting that the user has already profited significantly from their actions, amassing multiple six figures of profit that have been withdrawn.
It is surprising that they are attempting to raise additional claims on third-party platforms like BCT, with crucial information omitted.
As of now, the user's account has been fully reinstated and can be used in the usual manner.
Oh! Great, you finally here. I've sent you several PMs regarding open cases against you, I believe i don't have to mention each of them again. If you need the list though, you might find
this helpful.
Moving on and focusing on this case, as you claimed that OP omitted crucial information, that his account was frozen due to the bonus abuse [by using that mNFT] and he fully knows about this, how sure are we that he knew? Had he been informed by his host that he had a problem with as you described above instead of having a low wager? Because based on his screenshot, your host just told him that his problem was with the wager, not with the mNFT.