First, thank you very much that we are getting this solved here.
That things are not getting messy, let's agree to structure this a little bit.
I'll add numbers for the points, that we can see, where we have found consensus.
To keep our topics short, let's use the following system for now:
Bold numbers mean, it's important to address, please reply.
Normal numbers mean, just a comment.
1. I think all of the above "structure things" is the first thing to get some structure into this.
2. Agreements on bold numbers from both of us are final from now on.
3. No edited posts to prevent abuse in our discussion, only posts from LoyceV's archives are relevant to prevent abuse.
In addition, that's setting an extremely dangerous precedent, where one power-hungry DT member is trying to dictate another member's ability to give out trust feedbacks.
And DT will probably remove you, not me.
1- I am not a DT member
4.
People like you would be allowed to vote of course.
"Eligible" DT members or how we call that, since your request to theymos.
I want to have this as decentralized as possible without trolls or alt accounts abusing this.
Truly decentralized and fair.
Do you agree?
Noted, but I've a fundamentally different view on this.
Let's keep this topic open for now, we can still decide to lock the topic in case in the topic are, let's say more than 10 posts, per day.
That way, everyone will be able to follow the discussion and still, this topic will not explode.
Discussion is frozen until then, where we are from my post on here.
You can leave you some time, to reply. No need to reply immediately.
That's why I have added the numbers system.
Agreed on this point?
That we treat each other fair.
No name-calling.
Pure arguments, who's a thick skinned leader.
I'm not a friend of backdoor deals. That's what corrupt governments do, deceiving the people with such shady backdoor deals.
Keep it public, like Bitcoin's Blockchain.
10. It took me really long to type this reply as I'm just typing this from a phone, all the formatting, all the structure. I'm really exhausted.
Considering that I'll only be able to reply from my phone, please have some mercy.
That things are not getting messy, let's agree to structure this a little bit.
I'll add numbers for the points, that we can see, where we have found consensus.
To keep our topics short, let's use the following system for now:
Bold numbers mean, it's important to address, please reply.
Normal numbers mean, just a comment.
1. I think all of the above "structure things" is the first thing to get some structure into this.
2. Agreements on bold numbers from both of us are final from now on.
3. No edited posts to prevent abuse in our discussion, only posts from LoyceV's archives are relevant to prevent abuse.
In addition, that's setting an extremely dangerous precedent, where one power-hungry DT member is trying to dictate another member's ability to give out trust feedbacks.
And DT will probably remove you, not me.
1- I am not a DT member
People like you would be allowed to vote of course.
"Eligible" DT members or how we call that, since your request to theymos.
I want to have this as decentralized as possible without trolls or alt accounts abusing this.
Truly decentralized and fair.
Do you agree?
2- I am not trying dictate your feedback, this is a false accusation, it would be true if I asked you to send me a positive feedback, or to remove a feedback on some scammer profile.
5.Noted, but I've a fundamentally different view on this.
I am asking for a fair usage of the trust system, which is whiting my rights as forum member,
6. I can agree on this one. But fair means = there's always a decentralized checks and balances system involved, like Bitcoin is decentralized as well. To avoid any further drama and spare the community another 70 or so pages on this, I am willing to go with option 2, but then you say you won't delete your feedback, this means, there will still be victims affected by your abuse, I and many others (including the victims) view your feedback that says something like " Pro Russian, not to be trusted bla bla" as an abuse, in the same way I would view "Pro Ukrainian, not to be trusted bla bla".
7. Let's keep this topic open for now, we can still decide to lock the topic in case in the topic are, let's say more than 10 posts, per day.
That way, everyone will be able to follow the discussion and still, this topic will not explode.
I have never spent more time on this board than I did in the last couple of days, so I will not comment here any further unless a direct question is pointed to me although I hope nobody asks me anything anymore because I feel that I have said everything I need to say here.
8. If it's too much for you, we can agree that you are able to lock the topic until 01.01.2024. Discussion is frozen until then, where we are from my post on here.
You can leave you some time, to reply. No need to reply immediately.
That's why I have added the numbers system.
Agreed on this point?
If you have anything "new" to say to me personally, feel free to PM me, this way we could both stop drilling this thread.
9. I believe it is important for everyone to keep the discussion public, as DT members can see how we reach consensus. That we treat each other fair.
No name-calling.
Pure arguments, who's a thick skinned leader.
I'm not a friend of backdoor deals. That's what corrupt governments do, deceiving the people with such shady backdoor deals.
Keep it public, like Bitcoin's Blockchain.
10. It took me really long to type this reply as I'm just typing this from a phone, all the formatting, all the structure. I'm really exhausted.
Considering that I'll only be able to reply from my phone, please have some mercy.