thats what "scaling" is for rather then "LEAPING"
just saying no is not the solution to LEAPING.. scaling is the solution to leaping
also SCALING is about the long run.. its not about the high-jump.. (two different sporting events)
Unfortunately, I don't follow you. I will quote myself:
To this extent, I think increasing the block size a little will not hurt, but I am against it because it will not solve the "problem" on the long run.
I don't want to increase the blocksize "just a little" because in my opinion it will not solve the issue.
I don't want to increase the blocksize "a lot" because of the reasons I have already mentionned.
So I don't want to scale, leap, high-jump, run, dive or do any sporting event.
If the blocksize scales "a little", I will accept it, even though I disagree.
If the blocksize scales "a lot", I am leaving.
So simple!
SCALING is not a one time "just a little" its not a one time "alot".
its a long run of progressive steps..
you solve the long run by doing the long run.. one foot infront of the other..
we dont need 1gb blocks today.
today we can fix the issues of the 4mb block to allow more transactions to actually get to potentials of 16k transactions instead of stuck at averages under 4.2k. without adjusting more then 4mb..
then move to 8mb and at later date progress again. and more later to progress again..
one step infront of the other.. step by step
.. this is literally the meaning of scaling.. the long run
all the other detractors/objectors talking about needing to high jump now to solve the long run later..(facepalm)
all the other detractors/objectors talking about a high jump cant happen now so lets do nothing at all..(facepalm)
all the other detractors/objectors completely ignoring/avoiding/ twist/lie about discussion of SCALING (facepalm)