~snip~
But, if the casino refuses to transfer the winnings to the player’s account due to the fact that he cannot confirm his identity (this can be for various reasons, including justified preservation of the player’s safety) and cannot pass KYC, then an appeal to the regulator such a player cannot do either. This is simply due to the fact that no government authority considers appeals from anonymous persons. And for the same reasons it is impossible to go to court. This creates a vicious circle. And the player can only either stop being anonymous, or lose the money that he honestly won in the casino.
I reason that the authorities need to come up with some guarantees for such players to receive fair winnings. And at the same time, at the request of the player, remain anonymous.
A gambler who trusts the casino will comply with the rules implemented by the casino so that they can continue the verification process and also the money withdrawal process. And the casino also knows this and will immediately complete all the processes. But shady casinos won't do it because they don't care about the comfort of their customers or the regulators. That is the reason why many gamblers are always careful in choosing a casino so they can avoid problems.
And yes, it would be best if the authorities could provide guarantees to players who can win big wins to help those players get them. Players will also always try to follow the rules of the casino so that they can gamble comfortably and calmly.