The OP may have been right about some things, but now it has turned into a witch hunt as I clearly see that all 1miau’s ill-wishers have run into this thread and are trying to scream as loudly as possible. If 1miau leaves the forum it will be a big loss for the forum (by the way, he told me that he is leaving the campaign in which he participated).
[...] Perhaps 1miau could take back these two negative trust entries (even if I probably agree with them with their opinion about Snork1979 but I don't speak Russian) and convert them to neutral, and delete some entries in this thread written probably in anger (for example the unexplainably harsh attack on mole0815). Not much really questionable behaviour would be left. As I already said I agree generally with their quite harsh-looking, but often justified actions against low-quality posting.
Yes, but it doesn't matter since he wasn't the first to give these two users negative feedback. In addition, I am deeply convinced that if we, as a self-sufficient community, adhere to the views of 1 person, then nothing good will end.
After the introduction of the flag system, red feedback can serve for other "overconfident things (c)". I have always been surprised how everyone vehemently quotes the admin’s phrase in which he talks about the correct use of the feedback system, referring to “trading risks,” but everyone forgets that the feedback system was created for the community and works only thanks to it.
By the way, I am the first to leave negative feedback to this user, because I am deeply convinced that he deserves it, since his rude nationalist statements and repeated calls for the murder of other people are one of the worst things that can happen in our community. And based on this, I am convinced that if he had the opportunity to take away any material property from you or me with impunity, he would do it without any hesitation, so yes ... my tag addressed to this user will remain red, since I believe that this is more than a “trading risk”.