Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Is 1miau fit for DT?
by
jokers10
on 25/11/2023, 06:53:45 UTC
Regarding a possible solution:

The last time, I’ve already made massive concessions regarding future trust feedbacks.

To find a suitable solution, I’m also willing to review all of my trust feedbacks in question.
But I’ll decide which ones will stay and which ones will get removed. That’s already a massive concession since I believe, that trust interference is setting a very dangerous precedent, as described above.

So, I’m crossing my red line both in future feedbacks and also in past feedbacks. I’ve done my part here to find a solution, also for future "abuses", where anyone can complain here but if there’s not enough controversy for these presented "cases" of my new, neutral trust feedbacks, these people will expose their true, malicious intentions.  Wink

Deleting politically motivated tags would be a right decision. Leaving any political tags by any DT member opens Pandora's box: if this will become legitimate we can face with different political DT gangs and the result of DT wars will be based on a number of friends in each. If there will be more or less equal number of friends, then just nearly all will get red tags. It doesn't matter if I agree with your political position or not. I don't agree with political tags in the Trust system in general.

When I walked down the list of DT members to look at their tags to see if I want to add someone to my own Trust list I saw a political tag left by your account and some other accounts and that was a significant reason not to add them to my Trust list. It doesn't matter which political stance do you take, what matters is that politically motivated tags is what should not be in the Trust system. By default.

And you can see that a total majority of DT members has no politically motivated tags at all, I guess they understand the risks it could bring.