I have observed that the rich, I mean those who are financially comfortable, win more in gambling than the poor. By poor, I mean those who do not have enough to meet all their needs. I don't know the reason for this. Could it be that the rich understand financial management more? Or could it be that the rich are less desperate to win which make them make better gambling decision? I really want to know the reason for this pattern I have observed.
Because of the difference on bankroll. Rich people have a huge bankroll that gives them freedom to increase bet or play more until they win huge amount while poor has only limited bankroll which they will stop immediately once they lose enough.
This is the reason why poor shouldn't play gambling because it was intended for source of entertainment not a way to escape poverty. Bankroll is very important on gambling to stay longer until you hit your streak to profit.
This is just a misconception, gambling is meant for everybody. Who told you that the rich should gamble more, or often win more gamble than the poor? I believe the wager size is deceiving you. Both have their level playing ground, only that the poor might not be using their senses well. What I see here is that the poor should "cut their clothe according to their clothe," and they should use their brain and not be aggressive in gambling or believing they can get quick money from it. By doing this, they could probably do themselves a favour by not wasting too much money with the way they often recklessly bet without proper planning and management. I blame the poor for most of their misdeeds in gambling because of a lack of plan because I have many friends who are guilty of this. They know how to bet on sports very well but are not reasonable and calculative in their betting due to greed, they want to make more money very fast and will be permutating many games together thereby increasing the risk. So if one loses, the whole ticket has spoiled.
The poor might win more gamble than the rich but the rich would use more money to leverage on their winning. So why can' the poor be contended with what they gain also with their little money, why increase their risk in betting because of greed? And who is to be blamed for this if not them? If the rich bet with $10,000, the poor could bet with $10 if that is what they are capable of. The moment they are emotional about this and start taking more risks, that is how the problem starts.