So, just to clarify:
A user creates a small change output using Samourai. Samourai clearly displays this change output before the transaction is signed, and gives the user ample opportunity to change it if they want. The user is happy with the size of the change output and goes ahead with the transaction.
Just to clarify: You do not create "change outputs" with WabiSabi, your entire balance is turned private.
This change output is deliberately segregated in to a different account and so no privacy is lost.
You are lying. Changing the derivation path of the change output doesn't improve its privacy.
A user reuses an address on both sides of a Wasabi coinjoin. Outputs from the coinjoin land on the exact same address as the inputs they came from, resulting in a complete and critical loss of privacy. According to Kruw, this is all the users fault and has nothing to do with Wasabi.
You mean "According to Peter Todd":
https://youtu.be/oPNFdhZUGmk?t=162You continue to dodge the fact that Bitcoin experts have already debunked this false claim and continue to attack open source Bitcoin privacy software.
According to Kruw:
Samourai - doesn't work
Sparrow - doesn't work
Whirlpool - doesn't work
JoinMarket - doesn't work
Jam - doesn't work
Monero - doesn't work
Atomic swaps - don't work
P2P swaps/trades - don't work
Mixers - don't work
Wasabi - perfect, infallible
Isn't it amazing how thousands of developers of dozens of different privacy projects are all so incredibly wrong, and only the pro-surveillance, pro-censorship, pro-government sell outs are the ones who got it right.

Joinmarket, Jam, and Monero do work for privacy. Stop trying to whitewash Samourai/Sparrow's Whirlpool and your "mixing site" scams by putting them alongside working privacy projects like Joinmarket, Jam, and Monero.