Read again. The flag was created because the user who raised it got damaged from a violation of a contract, the clauses was not due to ignoring players [plural] for months. We "rushed" to remove the flag simply because there is no more reason to support it. The user raising the flag has been made whole and forgave the act, withdrawn the flag himself. The clauses on the flag that we affirm to be true to our knowledge when we supported it are no longer true.

Tell me, in your opinion, do we still have to support something and affirm to our best knowledge that it is true, while we know it is no longer correct? If we keep our support to the no longer valid flag, is it not, arguably, an incorrect practice of flag support?

Regarding backroom deal, you're free to check and investigate, but I am sure if there's any, then it'll be us ushering them into solving the cases for your and other player's sake, where we demanding them to look into the cases.

Now please confirm, if you've got your fund in full and accept this case as solved, or do you think there's still some things that need to be straightened?