Like what I said in many posts in this topic. zkSNACKS' decision to filter transactions was truly never for the benefit of its users. It was made for the benefit of its own protection from government harrasment.
That's what I understood from blog post written on Wasabi's website.
But to be honest, there is nothing wrong if it was done to its own protection from government harassment because it's never a clever idea to get yourself arrested or bury alive a good project, or at least once a good project.
That's what I said in many of my posts in the topic. In fact, I tried to defend Wasabi's decision when everyone who posted in here were attacking Kruw for it. It was merely to try to look at the situation from their point of view. We may not like it, but it was the right thing for them.
But my view still stays the same, I think Wasabi is not the best choice for one's privacy because they fund blockchain analysis and blockchain analysis companies are enemy of privacy, their main aim is to destroy the existence of privacy, that's what they want. Now one can call it whatever they want, fighting against crime or etc but it still destroys privacy.
From another viewpoint, if you want "privacy" + "clean" outputs, if you hold "tainted" coins and found a way for your inputs to pass through Wasabi's filter, do it.