The service's onion is offline, which means police managed to seize the backend server
It's offline, unlike CM's .onion, which was seized. That's a big difference.In this case, there is also not as extensive and detailed a report as there was in the case of CM. Also, I did not find anywhere that any amount of Bitcoin was confiscated, only two addresses were marked and that with relatively small amounts.
btw, the account immediately had 3 neg trust 
That's just to prevent them from joining a signature campaign later 
Seriously though: 2 of the 3 negatives are for "impersonating". That can be clarified with one small text file.
I don't think they care about things here, trust ratings, signature campaigns or anything. The account was created only to present certain information and will probably no longer be active.
Although I am quite convinced that the person who wrote those posts from that account, is not the first time on Bitcointalk. I'm quite surprised by the promptness with which they informed us that they had seized someone's website.