Re: The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.
⭐ Merited by paxmao (1)
~
The "forgotten" part you mentioned, is only something that you have forgotten or never seen.
Trump and his people tried to bring their evidence to the Supreme Court. But they were turned away because:
1. SCOTUS doesn't have to hear any case they don't want to hear;
2. Cases that SCOTUS is designed to hear are man against man or man against artificial entity;
3. Artificial entity against artificial entity, if SCOTUS wishes to hear it;
4. Never artificial entity against man.
All of Trump's attempts to bring an election fraud case were attempted as artificial entity against artificial entity. The 'person' of the representation that Trump used was an attorney-entity. SCOTUS doesn't have to hear an artificial entity bringing a case - 3 and 4 above. Since they wouldn't hear the case, the media forgot any evidence that Trump had. But if you do the right kind of searches on Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell and other of the Trump former team, you can dredge up the evidence that Trump was bringing.
You simply conveniently want to forget because, like paxmao, your country would be one that would receive less money from the US if Trump were in control.
The "forgotten" part you mentioned, is only something that you have forgotten or never seen.
Trump and his people tried to bring their evidence to the Supreme Court. But they were turned away because:
1. SCOTUS doesn't have to hear any case they don't want to hear;
2. Cases that SCOTUS is designed to hear are man against man or man against artificial entity;
3. Artificial entity against artificial entity, if SCOTUS wishes to hear it;
4. Never artificial entity against man.
All of Trump's attempts to bring an election fraud case were attempted as artificial entity against artificial entity. The 'person' of the representation that Trump used was an attorney-entity. SCOTUS doesn't have to hear an artificial entity bringing a case - 3 and 4 above. Since they wouldn't hear the case, the media forgot any evidence that Trump had. But if you do the right kind of searches on Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell and other of the Trump former team, you can dredge up the evidence that Trump was bringing.
You simply conveniently want to forget because, like paxmao, your country would be one that would receive less money from the US if Trump were in control.
Actually, I don't have any idea of what you are talking about. My country has been under USA sanctions for years and we do not receive any economical aid from Washington, if anything both Trump and Biden would love to be the ones in charge when/if USA managed to overthrown our corrupt leaders and corrupt authorities.
Also, it is not completely about the SCOTUS, I assume. Because in the 2 hours long call Trump had with the secretary of State of Georgia (who voted for Trump and is a long standing Republican), Trump tried to make the case ballots were scanned multiple times and the secretary of State told him that the video had been put out of context by Ruddy.
So how come a Republican ally of Trump would not play along and call for the results of the election to be changed ? Perhaps he was an agent of the Deep state or simply did not want to break his loyalty to the office he assumed.
It's easily understandable that you don't have any idea about what I say. To understand it better, understand this:gobbledygook gobbledygook gobbledygook :
1. gobbledygook
2. gobbledygook
It is the same for your gobbledygook and all gobbledygook. The difference between gobbledygook is, some of the gobbledygook have it spoken/written out in the ope (the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, the formal gobbledygook of India, Bangladesh, and a few others), while other gobbledygooks try to hide it, and the government people of still other countries break these two points by forcing their people into all kinds of things on the threat of punishment or death.
Think deeply about this, and figure out how it works and why. It will give you the best understanding of the US gobbledygook, and your own country's government, that you will ever get. gobbledygookgobbledygookgobbledygook
Oh hey that reminds me....
Jan. 6 rioter who used sovereign citizen 'gobbledygook' at trial is found guilty
Quote
A Jan. 6 rioter who represented himself during a jury trial and advanced sovereign citizen arguments that a federal judge described as "bulls---" and "gobbledygook" was found guilty Tuesday and ordered into government custody.
Taylor James Johnatakis of Washington state was arrested in February 2021 and went to trial starting last week. After just a few hours of deliberation, a jury found Johntakis guilty on Tuesday of felony counts of obstruction of an official proceeding, assaulting officers and civil disorder, as well as four misdemeanor charges.
Judge Royce Lamberth had grown frustrated with Johnatakis during a pretrial conference last week that took place the day before jury selection began. Johnatakis repeatedly said that he wanted to accept "full liability" for the charges. “I would like to come to a resolution,” Johnatakis said, though he refused to plead guilty to the charges.
Johnatakis “could get a lesser sentence" if he "weren’t so hardheaded," Lamberth said.
"I'm telling you the facts of life. You don't believe me," Lamberth said. "When they find you guilty, you're going to jail."
Once the jury trial began, Johnatakis didn't call any witnesses or put on a defense.
"I have repented all my sins," Johnatakis said during the trial, saying he requested that Lamberth "discharge" the matter — a common phrase from sovereign citizens — since, he said, there was no "controversy" before the court.
During the trial, Johnatakis questioned an FBI agent, Michael Kiley, on whether he accepted Johnatakis' apology for his actions. Kiley responded that it wasn't his place to accept Johnatakis' apology.More than 1,200 people have been charged in connection with the Capitol attack, and more than 400 have received sentences of incarceration. Online "Sedition Hunters" say about 1,000 additional rioters have been identified, but not yet arrested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/jan-6-rioter-used-sovereign-citizen-gobbledygook-trial-found-guilty-rcna126236Taylor James Johnatakis of Washington state was arrested in February 2021 and went to trial starting last week. After just a few hours of deliberation, a jury found Johntakis guilty on Tuesday of felony counts of obstruction of an official proceeding, assaulting officers and civil disorder, as well as four misdemeanor charges.
Judge Royce Lamberth had grown frustrated with Johnatakis during a pretrial conference last week that took place the day before jury selection began. Johnatakis repeatedly said that he wanted to accept "full liability" for the charges. “I would like to come to a resolution,” Johnatakis said, though he refused to plead guilty to the charges.
Johnatakis “could get a lesser sentence" if he "weren’t so hardheaded," Lamberth said.
"I'm telling you the facts of life. You don't believe me," Lamberth said. "When they find you guilty, you're going to jail."
Once the jury trial began, Johnatakis didn't call any witnesses or put on a defense.
"I have repented all my sins," Johnatakis said during the trial, saying he requested that Lamberth "discharge" the matter — a common phrase from sovereign citizens — since, he said, there was no "controversy" before the court.
During the trial, Johnatakis questioned an FBI agent, Michael Kiley, on whether he accepted Johnatakis' apology for his actions. Kiley responded that it wasn't his place to accept Johnatakis' apology.More than 1,200 people have been charged in connection with the Capitol attack, and more than 400 have received sentences of incarceration. Online "Sedition Hunters" say about 1,000 additional rioters have been identified, but not yet arrested.
PS: The Kraken lawyer has plead guilty conspiring to intentionally interfere with the performance of election duties. After being charged with actual election fraud and a bunch of other felonies, she agreed to plead guilty to lesser charges and testify for the government in Trumps trial in exchange for 6 years of probation.
That's the Kraken lawyer. The one you mentioned in the very first post of this epic thread.
Here we go, boys and girls. The Kraken is finally starting to lift off the bottom. Click the links, and go to the site to show the many other links.
SIDNEY POWELL UPDATE
SIDNEY POWELL UPDATE
I still do not get what the appeal is to claim one is a sovereign citizen or similar stuff in order to try to get some valid defence at court if it has been proven already that such defense is not effective at all in a court. Not even mentioning the mistake representing oneself is if one does not have any kind of legal experience... To me, it seems this person wanted to emulate Darrell Brooks defense, but again, that was a failed defense.
Maybe he was not aware of the outcome of Darells Brooks trial and thought it was a good idea. I don't know.
Also, Powell got a good deal, in my opinion. Being a lawyer herself, she may be very informed of the consequences of her actions had he not taken a deal.