Ask yourself, why are central bankers offended by the existence of Bitcoin like it's a declaration of war against them? I honestly don't know why, but if they really hate it and discourage people from owning it, then it's probably doing something right.
It's obviously because Bitcoin has clearly achieved what central bankers struggle to do with fiat money. They discourage Bitcoin ownership to conceal their inability to safeguard people's funds. Bitcoin's perceived threat lies in its operation outside traditional financial systems, challenging established authorities and raising concerns about financial stability and regulatory control.
Certainly, if your approach to acquiring Bitcoin involves Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) or any other method, the crucial aspect is the ability to withstand market dynamics for the long term. It's not merely about the method of acquisition but, more importantly, about the commitment to hodl through market fluctuations. Deviating from this commitment may lead one to transition from the realm of a long-term hodler, with a steadfast vision, into the category of a short-term hodler or trader. Success in the realm of a Bitcoiner often hinges on the resilience to adhere to a long-term perspective despite the continuous volatility of the market.