Within the debate that is going on here about whether people do not care about their privacy, whether they will adopt CBDCs and whether we in this forum are an exception in caring about these issues, I wanted to ask: what do you think about the fact that in this forum there are people who work for a mixer, in the signature campaign,
and deposit the funds they receive directly into Binance? (see an image in the link)
Some user included me, received message from Binance that we recieved fund from Sinbad signature Escrow address and we have to give cleanliness that from where we recieved fund and what is our relationship with address owner.
I don't find the idea of receiving the payment and directly depositing it in a CEX like Binance, where you will be fully KYC'd, despite the fact that you are advertising a privacy tool, very coherent to say the least.
Well many will not use a mixer but advertise it.
Much like my late father-in-law he owned a bar and bartended 6 days/night a week.
Yet he did not drink.
I personally advertise a mixer as I no longer trust the USA government.
I believe they have drifted far off track in the last 30 years.
A constant failure of leadership and budgets year after year.
But I am Locked into the system my wife and I get 3 federal pensions so I personally do endless KYC.
Younger people can look at me and realize if privacy works for them they may want to try it out.
So much like my late father-in-law I do not 'drink'