It could be understood that I could still wear mixers' signatures as long as they don't contain a URL and my username isn't mixerABCD.
It's reasonably safe to assume that a sig of this nature is a paid ad... at least for the purposes of this rule. I like the revision a little better, it makes it possible to e.g. post news about the next mixer being seized by the FBI.
I just looked at your trust page to figure out who left what, and I have no clue what you're talking about. Did someone leave a neg for something you said related to the issue at hand, or do you have a persecution complex? I'm genuinely curious.
Og might be thinking that someone excluded him for saying something nasty about mixers, but the reality is that he started attacking people for wearing Chipmixer signatures (like LoyceV and myself and a few others) after he got called out on his own shenanigans.