Several people seem to be concerned that the current policy will be too disruptive/constraining. How about I make this modification to loosen it a bit: you can direct people to mixers by name (even in something like a "top 10 mixers" topic), as long as:
- You don't directly post their URLs.
- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.
Would this be sufficient to address the concerns?
Yes, I think that would be sufficient.
This would also allow people to type a word which refers to one thing but happens to be a name of a mixer without risking a ban.
Signature campaigns are not important in a time like this, especially when we have LE accounts descending posting public warnings here.
And I can answer: "There are torrent sites that you can do, it's a matter of searching on those sites."
With the exception that you should never suggest anyone to search a mixer on the Internet, unless you want them to get scammed.
You should never suggest anyone to use a mixer on Bitcointalk either, unless you want them to get scammed.
How many times do we have to tell you that the mixing industry is not, at large, a scamming industry?
What's the difference between a mixer getting seized and some other service (pretending to) hold your funds hostage by KYC?
The government approves of kyc.
The government has lots of guys with guns.
they will follow orders.
If they are telling you don’t use a mixer. Don’t use one.
So everyone needs to check rules of the country they are in and follow its rules.
And btc does not offer the promise of freedom it once did.