Thinking about it, the rule that merits cancel votes can lead to this type of situation: the user sending merits to those who vote for them in a category that they don't like.
It is expected that people want to win, but the opposite can also happen. So this management becomes complicated.
It is expected that people want to win, but the opposite can also happen. So this management becomes complicated.
franky1 did the same thing at the previous event:
- franky1 tried to abuse the system, by meriting 2 of those who nominated him as antihero, in order to have less votes at this category (facepalm)
However, in his case I overruled the existing rule, as this user tried to abuse the contest in plain sight. Same will happen now. In any case, Royse "managed" to obtain even more votes at that category, thus franky1 got "only" second place. Perhaps he'll have more luck this year?
