One benefit of allowing advertising of these campaigns (that will become clearer from the ban forward) is the force of good practice on services by holding reputation as collateral in exchange for advertising.
I've seen many scamming mixers over the years. Until recently, I didn't realize some mixers may just be created by bad guys in need of good people looking for privacy. I can't be certain which mixers fall in which category, but by now I think it's likely both exist.
I also considered Bitcointalk the place to be to find honest mixers. It's weird though: that could mean a honest mixer is ran by what some governments consider to be criminals.
To top it off we have a staff member who acknowledges the following:
Instead of offtopic and trolling, better do some forum research if you're so interested.
But who does not take action on this, such as deleting the ridiculous off topic garbage replies from Shenanigan on the subject.
"Staff" members can't delete posts. Xal0lex is a Moderator on his own boards, not on Meta.
BenCodie, please change the thread title to something like: "Discussion, LoyceV powers on the forum."
The off-topic troll is welcome to spam
LoyceV's reputation thread.
I've deleted my post responding to the troll. I should have known better.
The title of this topic is a little misleading as I initially thought that it had something to do about the mixer ban.
I thought the same. That probably didn't help in staying on-topic.
I'll be making a new self-moderated topic if a moderator doesn't remove the obvious spam
You can't do that in Meta.