So build one. The correct solution to too many transactions and too high fees is to increase throughput or move more transactions to a second layer, not to exclude a whole bunch of transactions that some people subjectively consider to be spam.
No, I don't have the skills, but I'm a node runner and a Bitcoin user so I can talk whatever I want about it anyway. This is a discussion forum, I'm not on the development section if you didn't notice.
Nobody "subjectively" consider anything to be spam. It is spam because block space is being used for things that are not related to "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System". This is Satoshi's description of what the system is, and introducing ways to inject more data into the blockchain for a variety of purposes will dimm the main purpose down until its just another shitcoin that only big companies can afford to run nodes.
How can it be peer to peer when third parties can ban your transactions?
The proposal is not to ban transactions, the proposal is to avoid or make expensive to make "Inscriptions" inside transactions.
The transfer of UTXOs from one address to the other is not under discussion here.