Genau. Ursprünglich war das ein "beiläufiger" Kommentar im Bounty-Signatur Faden. Nachdem Lakai den Screenshot dann auch im Sinbad-Faden geteilt hat, ist das aber schnell größer geworden als beabsichtigt, hab zwischendurch einiges an PMs bekommen.
Hey, first let me apologize that this post is in English, but I'm really bad with German.
I'm trying to follow the development of your case, but there are discussions about it in several places, so it's a little more difficult for me to connect everything. You gave me some explanations, but that thread is now locked. If I understood correctly, Wednesday was the deadline to send them the requested information. Can you share whether you got a final answer from them and what the final outcome was?
As the matter with Sinbad is very specific, what do you think about making a topic where you will present the process you went through here?
I sent funds from the Sinbad campaign to Binance a couple of times, but it was never directly from the escrow wallet but from my private address. So far I have not received any requests from them. In fact, I'm most curious about how they determine which transactions to check and how deep they go.
thx
yes, the discussion is a little scattered around several places, because i never intended to make a topic out of it. To be honest, i don't even think the issue is that "big" to be worth an own thread.
My personal guess is that binance has no interest in going deeper and just has to ask some questions to pretend to be interested in laws at all. At least i got an answer per PM from another affected user, that his case (same situation) was closed after the questionaire and i do expect the same result for me in some days/weeks.