Re: Finally Bitcoin Devolpers planning to kill Ordinals and Inscription
So I took franky1 off ignore for a few seconds to see what hilariously irrational drivel he was spouting and I certainly wasn't disappointed. He now wants to maintain the stance that Core devs are simultaneously holding Bitcoin back, but at the same time rushing changes through too quickly. 
Classic.
Back on ignore you go, you spectacular fucking kook.
And that's fine. But if people are going to advocate for continually moving the goalposts on what those limits are, purely because they want to prevent a certain type of transaction, that's still a road to disaster in my view.
When everyone knows what the limits are, people are free to transact. And yes, some people will inevitably find methods of exploiting or abusing those limits. But if those limits keep getting tighter, to try and catch out the ones exploiting it, you'll also catch innocent parties who are suddenly outside of a limit they were previously within.
Classic.
Back on ignore you go, you spectacular fucking kook.
there are already several limitation how people use Bitcoin whether on protocol or node level. For example, minimum relay fee, minimum output amount and 80 bytes limit on OP_RETURN.
And that's fine. But if people are going to advocate for continually moving the goalposts on what those limits are, purely because they want to prevent a certain type of transaction, that's still a road to disaster in my view.
When everyone knows what the limits are, people are free to transact. And yes, some people will inevitably find methods of exploiting or abusing those limits. But if those limits keep getting tighter, to try and catch out the ones exploiting it, you'll also catch innocent parties who are suddenly outside of a limit they were previously within.