Regardless, its hard to take you seriously when you continue to mischaracterize Ordinals as an "attack". Its like you don't understand what the word "attack" means and it doesn't help your argument. Ordinals users are not trying to damage Bitcoin, they are simply trying to profit off it. And saying "only scammers like it" is just ignorant. A more appropriate term would be "degens".
In the future, the first inscriptions will be considered legitimate collector's items, like it or not. It could even be the first 10,000 - 100,000 or so.
its not a collectors item. it fails the real proof oftransfer because the junk sits as metadata in witness, it does not within transaction assign itself to an output
the GUI of ordinal recognising wallets can EASILY change policy of output path.
if the proof of destination is not locked into the blockchain. its not a proof of transfer system
as for the math method of counting sats, even their path of deciding where the first sat goes is wrong.
you seem too involved in promoting and admiring ordinals and ignoring the logic and economics to e an outsider.. you are definitely someone that created or scam sold some to someone.. or at worse you paid someone for what you think is a claim of a junk meme and want to not admit to being a victim so ignorantly ignoring the code, logic and math that show you got victimised