I didn't say pushed out, I said priced out. I believe there's an obvious difference. It is as the network was designed, to be robust. Plus by keeping the costs of running a full node low, the costs are pushed to the users. I wouldn't say that it isn't annoying for plebs like me though.
My apologies , i'm not a native english speaker and i thought the context was the same . Had to ask chatgpt :
Priced Out: This implies that the user is unable to afford or participate due to the high fees, making the transaction network inaccessible.
Pushed Out: This suggests a force or external factor (in this case, high fees) that is causing the user to be excluded or compelled to leave the network.
I diasgree that the network was designed this way .
On the contrary , satoshi said that when demand starts to rise , users should not run nodes and start using spv's . The core's mentality that miners and pools are bad is the one that made people want to give the ability to everyone to run a node with very low specs . A proverb in my country says " you can't paint easter eggs with farts " .
In the context that Satoshi is a developer, not a "god", and Bitcoin is an open source project, not a church - Currently the developers who are in charge have design-decisions on the network to maintain decentralization and security first, and transaction throughput second.
And for the possible argument that there's no high demand for transactions , so no need for increase in blocksize of base layer to keep fees down , look at how many tens of thousands of projects exist because btc can't handle all those transactions or users don't use it due to high fees .
OK, then shouldn't the big blockers start marketing their forked chains for Ordinals users? Shouldn't they demo their networks that it could handle all the demand for blocks? Why keep criticizing the Bitcoin Core Developers and making it a philosophical debate?
BCash and BCash SV chains are better, OK, all Ordinals users should use them.
Why don't they build on the "Bitcoin" with big blocks? That would be "more efficient" and more sustainable, no?
Actually they build , much more than just nft's and in extremely higher volume . Maybe you should check it out , things happening in btc now were started years ago in other sha-256 chains .
OK, good luck. I hope they build it better than Ethereum.