Very true indeed! You have made a pretty bold statement and surely if disappearing is good for everyone then a platform should do that rather then doing something that may not be good for others who unintentionally get affected because of it.


I believe that Phil was just predicting the scenario that could happen because no one expected that SB will get seized but it got seized and that's why such questions come in mind of those who were promoting that signature on their profiles.  Binance's notification to users who have received deposits from the campaign also caused much fear in participants mind because that was something unexpected.

I think anyone who's sensitive enough will think a lot about the things that can happen with them. Although, campaign participants had no direct relationship with SB but still the matter is somewhat concerning. I hope that there won't be any issues to the participants or the manager as they were not sure about something like that and I'm pretty sure that authorities know better that who's wrong and who isn't.