De Gea is a better alternative for Newcastle United. He is younger than Hugo Lloris and I think he is a better goalkeeper. But today Newcastle United urgently need a goalkeeper. So Hugo Lloris can also solve Newcastle United's problems. De Gea is not a mandatory alternative. But we have to say that what happened today was a planning error. Newcastle United's management should have foreseen this situation in advance and signed a well-qualified backup goalkeeper. I think we can see that they failed in this regard.
De Gea is only 3 years younger than Lloris, it's pointless for them to sign an old goalkeeper. There's no good goalkeeper out there, the current Tottenham goalkeeper which is Vicario is fine enough. They currently have 3 amateur goalkeepers, so they still have many substitute goalkeepers.
Tottenham need to find new defender since there are five injured defenders right now.
For the age of goalkeepers, David de Gea's current age can still be used for a few more years, but with a note that he will be able to give his best in his game. Indeed, young players will give a very long time, especially in the position of goalkeeper will usually be difficult to replace.
Seeing from the last performance when he was still in the Manachester United uniform, actually his game was not disappointing, it's just that he didn't get the trust of the coach which eventually made him have to leave. In fact, his replacement players who have 6 years of age below him are also unreliable now.
Any club that is set to sign Da Gea should have him as a short term project. I am not a fan of signing old players for a long term purposes. I have heard some news about David having some eyes problems requiring surgery but at a time I couldn't read the story anywhere again. Was it a fallacy or an intentional propaganda?
-snip
Only a stupid club will carry out this dismissal because after the dismissal many clubs will come to bring in Ronaldo. about being arrogant or something like that is already a character, but of course there is a reason for that attitude. The best players are also humans and they have traits that may be unpredictable. Now the important thing is how the player performs on the field.
a star player has an arrogant nature which is appropriate because his arrogance is commensurate with the contribution and talent he has and usually has strong reasons for carrying out such arrogance and I am quite sure that if Ronaldo is sacked any team will lose its best player like Man United who is currently still in bad situation.
The idea of Ronaldo being arrogant was first coined by Blata the former FIFA president. Many people confuses arrogance with pride and ego. Every play has their weak point and many players will seem humble because they aren't star yet. I have followed Ronaldo right from childhood and I can say that he is Humane and friendly to be with. Maybe he knows his worth and not ready to allow many shits slide.