If there is a 51% network attack on Bitcoin and we can avoid it via some code modification, would you support it or not?
If we need developers to dictate which chain is the "correct" chain, rather than the network, then bitcoin has failed. You can already have this kind of centralized "developers decide" approach with the vast majority of altcoins.
It will be censorship if we implement the support of blockchain analysis companies in Bitcoin network. It's not censorship to kill ordinals.
In your opinion.
Are we going to ignore bitcoin whitepaper?
Every development in bitcoin in the last 10 years isn't mentioned in the whitepaper. If we only went on the whitepaper, we wouldn't even be using addresses, only pubkeys.
Is bitcoin for everyone who want to improve privacy and independence from financial institutes or is it only for rich people?
And is bitcoin for everyone who wants to use it, or is it only for people who use it in the ways that we decide are acceptable?