Where someone posseses a habitual biasing issues towards it oppositions, as a Bitcoin investor or Bitcoin trader, who are we supposed to be biased about? is the the AltCoins that copies and emulates the potential differences of Bitcoin? Or is it the fiat currency that the government holds as a tool (weapon) to standing against the welfares of Bitcoin across its invertors over the globe? Or do we have our darling Bitcoin to be blamed unconciously with its flexibilities romances with the Fiats and the AltCoins?
Active Bitcoiner warriors, draw your swords ⚔️ let's get this done and have ourselves diving in the pools of Bitcoins potentials and merry over the conqueror of ending the global economical challenges.
I think we should be biased about fiat and governments but with alts too. If I have to tell on the level of a scale then I will say 90% biased with fiat and governments and 10% with alts, because alts are under BTC and we know that, so we should not compete with our BTC swords against alt's plastic or fake knives. We should oppose fiat and governments not because they are against BTC. Because they are not providing us the financial freedom.
I think you should make a correction that, now even though governments are not against BTC because of ETFs and adoption of it, we can see governments are also adopting BTC and want to make money out of it. And the last reason is we have our darling BTC and its features that make us unique from all and make us fall in love with her.
As a BTC investor, I will say BTC is the best haven if compared with fiat, banking schemes, or alts, due to many reasons. We can't conqueror the global economic challenges with the current state of BTC because of its scalability issues, until they get resolved we should not say BTC can resolve economical challenges.