The OP was never interested in knowing the name of the mixer he allegedly lost $7 with while he was mixing. Or to make it more, when someone created a thread (especially Scam Accusation) and does not even provide any evidence it cannot be taken seriously.
Furthermore, when the one accusing is then asked to provide evidence but all that is presented are more ramblings rather than coherent statements (but evidence is conveniently missing), it all points to this being an attention-seeking exercise by the OP.
Nope, Mixy is not the only one. The criteria where it has something similar to "money" and had advertised here but no longer did so was also shared by WW, and WW should make more sense, given it have more massive campaign and logically reached wider audience. But nope, not WW. And should not be mixy either, as OP already gave
this thread a read [it has list of mixers] and none rings a bell, and the thread has mixy on its list.
Right, OP? None of the mixer on that list, or anyone suggested here sounds familiar? Including any on
this list suggested by
NotATether? But it's not important anymore, is it? You're not really interested to know their name anymore, are you?