2. Add the Cyber security and Privacy board in the Other category of the forum:
Name: Cybersecurity and Privacy
Category: Other
Description: Discussion about cybersecurity and online privacy and its improvement to minimize the risk of data breaches, hacks, tracking or system compromise which may result in exploitation or loss of Bitcoins.
Even if this is granted, it has a complete different approach to tackle the issues on ground concerning mixers and I don't think this can change anything, but the whole idea of the cyber security measure is a good idea but considering that with mixers ban may change nothing about the decision already made.
It is a completely different approach, yes. It is enabling the discussion of measures that can be made in the future...maybe, more evolved measures. Maybe, more evolved, decentralized mixer, or decentralized exchange discussion, and how to go about building these on the Bitcoin ecosystem. Maybe, discussion about alternative on-chain privacy that is less frowned upon by authorities and less preferable by bad parties. The possibilities are endless with a discussion board that involves privacy. Cyber security and privacy go hand in hand, security keep people safe, privacy keep people safe. The two topics go hand in hand.
I will ask you nevertheless to mention some of those "rights and privileges" that he has and the other regular users don't
LoyceV has ability to unban. But he is not a global moderator. How is this even possible?
Always say something you have an idea about it, have you ever seen a situation whereby you see loycev getting users unbanned, and if you're mistaking from that of proxy ban, then many other people has that same right to unbanned newbies who have evil record of their IP address used at the point of registration, which i think should be something entirely different from the normal ban we are talking about here in this context.
Let's not feed this pointless discussion.