Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Casino vs. Stoc,Forex&Crypto Broker: Who's Really Playing You in the Money Game
by
delfastTions
on 15/12/2023, 12:02:10 UTC

It seems to me that this measure is not just coming from the US government, but rather coming from many countries, as in cases of increasing terrorism in the world, the governments of first world countries have started to put tough KYC measures, but this measure is still it did not affect the cryptocurrency market, this is because the cryptocurrency market is not a regulated market, there are no laws on cryptocurrencies, the US governments, like many governments, accept that their citizens use cryptocurrencies, but these governments have not yet made laws on cryptocurrencies. but as this market started to move a lot of money and unfortunately, many large mixer sites began to appear that were involved in serious crimes

Everything that you wrote, of course, takes place in the real world and the regulation of cryptocurrencies will probably be done at the legislative level, first in the USA, and then, as I think, by analogy with the legislation of the USA and similar laws in other countries.  In this regulation of cryptocurrencies, it is important to maintain at least partial possibility of anonymous payments, which is an integral property and advantage of cryptocurrencies.  But only so that law-abiding citizens can do this.  Nor could criminals do it.  This is an insoluble issue in practice; it seems to me that it is extremely difficult to find a compromise, and legislators simply don’t even seem to know how to solve it optimally.  A nd by introducing KYC everywhere, they of course destroy anonymity.  And along with the criminals who will be prevented from transferring money, ordinary, good citizens, for whom it is important to remain anonymous in some payment matters, will also suffer.  I believe that completely eliminating anonymity with laws and making almost banking transparency in crypto-payments is wrong, I hope the bill will take into account the public need for anonymous and legal payments.  And somehow they will filter out the possibilities of crimin al use of cryptocurrencies.

He is right about everything, what I can say about this is that every time the USA makes one of these movies, it is not for something good, it is to take away freedoms, I am a peron because it has always been in decline with the regulation because at one time The government and banks in the world did not give importance to Bitcoin, now that everything is being talked about and they know that the Bitcoin economy is much larger and more Robust , because they want to do more things to be able to keep it up to date, I really do. I think about this is that as long as we are in a world where everything is centralized, things with casinos will be the same, with crypto too, I have seen many who agree with taxes, I have seen many who use Bitcoin and agree I agree, I think that that irreverence that I always mention no longer exists, because we are people who are always looking for something more, with Bitcoin things are Different, we are an economy that is free of all control , perhaps that is why the governments and banks act in that way.-

If we look at it, if we let Governments get back into this technology and banks thing again, then it's because we like to live in an almost squalid system, a system where we like them to take the yoke and start doing things like this in a brave way, in an obligatory way, and I really don't understand, I don't understand the human Being for being so submissive, even in this thing that is completely free, we are wrong, in the majority of exchanges, it is secure KYC  , in the Brokers all before entering must comply with the KYC, now with the casinos too, I think everything has somehow been made public that privacy is no longer relevant , the Mixers are persecuted by the governments as if they were the worst thing , when we know that the Biggest crimes have been carried out with fiat money, then sometimes I see that Saying that this gives rise to crimes is Something that is not right , of course it is my personal opinion.

I share your opinion!  Of course, now all possibilities for direct anonymous payments between people using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are gradually being lost.  We increasingly feel an attack on the economic freedom of citizens from the banking community and the governments of different countries practically controlled by it.  This a archaic financial system with the mandatory participation of an intermediary such as a bank in non-cash payments cannot begin to disappear and, naturally, suits both those who greatly enrich themselves from this and governments that always keep their people in an almost slave state.  due to exploitation.  Unfortunately, this system is very strong and stable.  And there is still no real sign that Bitcoin and this blockchain technology have begun to beat the traditional banking system.  On the contrary, the banking community has seized the initiative by introducing the use of CBDC everywhere. 
Probably, if humanity remembers and strives for a free world, then this will probably happen after 5 generations of people, or even more. 
In this matter, I, unfortunately, have a pessimistic view of reality.