I should make a list of signature participants who constantly received PMs (sometimes offered spots publicly) from a specific campaign manager with the promise to pay better. Then they were successfully manipulated to stay with him so that they can only works in his campaigns to look like he is the best in the industry.
I know who you're referring to here and even a few details about what you're talking about, even if other might not. Speaking for myself only, I'm not taking sides in any feud between you and the other party because you both manage campaigns well. You're in a tough spot here, but I think
most people understand your position and that it was probably the safest, best move you could make even if it leaves a number of members unhappy. Nobody expected mixer advertising to be eliminated or that some of them were up to shady shit.
I don't know. I think you've said all you can say, and you know you're not going to make everyone happy. Continuing to argue about this is just going to aggravate you and anyone else who engages in the argument.