After your coins arrive in our props, your coins are split into random parts and sent to the biggest stock exchanges. You receive back purified BTC (depending on the mix mode you chose). You receive either coins from our clients who took advantage of the “max anonymity” mode, or you receive bitcoins sent from exchanges.
It turns out that even bitcoins coming from an exchange can be flagged as dirty. Yesterday, my wife sent bitcoins from her account on kraken.com to my account on bitpapa.com. My Bitpapa account was blocked, and Bitpapa wrote:
Unfortunately, our analytics system deems your transaction suspicious (high-risk level). This means that your transfer, platform, or wallet from which the transaction was made is funded from questionable sources. In such cases, we follow a strict protocol:
1. You need to undergo identity verification.
2. The transaction will be returned to the sender's wallet address.
If bitcoins from exchanges are no longer considered inherently clean, the purpose of exchanging non-exchange coins for exchange ones becomes obsolete.
Haha, are you amazed that coins coming from a legit exchange are flagged as dirty? That's how blockchain analysis works. All these AML scores and tags are bullshit, their algorithm doesn't work and I have a doubt that they tag transactions randomly to make it appear like their algorithm works and when you give them proof that your funds are clean and come from a legit source, they apologize and say that it was a false positive.
It turns out that even bitcoins coming from an exchange can be flagged as dirty. Yesterday, my wife sent bitcoins from her account on kraken.com to my account on bitpapa.com. My Bitpapa account was blocked, and Bitpapa wrote:
I created this topic a while ago, in which you will find all the discussions related to
Risk/AML scoreThese tools are not accurate and give results to the point that they cannot be relied upon as evidence in court and even Chainalysis failed to prove the accuracy of their results when there was an investigation.
The data showed that the volume of illegal transactions:
~snip~
If the data is correct and compared to trading volumes and there is no regulated market, the percentage is very low.
It's very bad that they represent bitcoin that way. First of all, if you are a victim of scam, that's not the fault of bitcoin. If you are a victim of theft, that's not the fault of bitcoin because you control your funds and if you lost them, search problem in yourself. I also think that they should put USD data next to Bitcoin to make things more clear.