I still don't get why some people insist of using the false term "censorship" when referring to an "exploit fix".
But as I've said a million times, we've been "censoring" a lot of abusing transactions that would fall under similar protocol exploits for as long as Bitcoin has existed so I don't see how things would be any different if we fix this newest exploit in the protocol!
I don't get why you're using the term "we."
You haven't been doing anything. Neither have I, but I don't harbor any sort of delusion that its at all up to me. The people who do have any sort of say are probably doing some careful balancing of pros and cons, putting a lot of consideration into potential "fixes" before taking any kind of action.
That's complete and utter nonsense. The tweet itself is a paradox! Layer suggests it is on top of something else, meaning the "base" has to work fine for the layer to also work.
The base layer is working fine. Its doing exactly what its supposed to do.